Spatial Dynamics of Vernal Pool Amphibians: Using Translocations to Determine Spatial Scales of Habitat Selection
Vernal pool restoration is increasing due in part to their contribution of critical habitat for amphibians. Discerning spatial patterns of amphibian use of these landscapes is critical to successful restoration. Individual-level habitat selection of a vernal pool facultative species, green frogs (Rana clamitans), was investigated in an experimental forest consisting of thirty-nine constructed pools. Movement parameters and habitat selection were measured using local translocations (n=146) across different types and scales of habitat and tracking movements using fluorescent powder. Pools are arranged in clusters of one, three, or nine. At each density, translocations were performed at three spatial scales: pool (avg = 13 m), intra-cluster (avg = 57 m), and inter-cluster (avg = 344 m). Translocation scale was found to influence movement parameters (step lengths and turning angles) but not the spatial setting of selected pools. This suggests that design of pool networks should consider species dispersal characteristics for how animals might encounter pools, but that specific design criteria for increasing or decreasing selection of pools in particular spatial settings may be difficult to obtain. This work has implications for how vernal pool networks are designed and managed; it helps guide an explicit spatial focus and can recommend pool spatial arrangements and associations with existing source populations.
Joseph Yavitt
Faculty: Project Co-PI
I like your approach to quantify dispersal distance. Do you know if there is a fitness component associated with dispersal distance. In other words, is ti possible that long distance dispersal results in a good habitat but has a high energy course that lowers reproduction?
Michael Habberfield
That’s a good question, and if we are to accurately use dispersal information to make predictions about metapopulation dynamics, fitness must be included. Because dispersal costs are high, reproductive success at a new site must actually exceed that of the original site in order to be advantageous. These costs are probably offset by more fit individuals (larger body size) being the ones that disperse longer distances (there is definitely a relationship between size at metamorphosis and survival). For most species, there is a distribution in how long individuals will wait before dispersal, and some may exhibit staged dispersal consisting of multiple intermediate movements.
Long-distance dispersal, despite the costs, may be advantageous by ensuring avoidance of suboptimal habitat which can act as ecological traps; higher reproduction in nearby, suboptimal sites may still have long-term disadvantages to the population (e.g. poor offspring survival, genetic effects related to inbreeding).
Related, very few species use long-distance acoustic calls to facilitate conspecific dispersal because of the high energy costs of such calls. Those species that do use them tend to have higher dispersal rates overall because they favor early-successional habitat which is less predictable in location.
Debashish Bhattacharya
Faculty
Is anything known about the genetic basis of dispersal distance in different frog species? Can you choose frog populations that are more or less mobile when designing the vernal pool system in a given habitat?
Michael Habberfield
Thanks for these questions that are provoking me to think a lot! To my knowledge, little is known about the genetic components of dispersal in amphibians. There is a good amount of information available describing dispersal rates and distances for many species, but for any particular species I don’t think there is much genetic guidance for dispersal variation. So, predictions of dispersal within a pool system can be made based on different target species, but I think your question was asking: for a given species, can we preferentially target a genetic subset with known dispersal characteristics to promote the desired amount of dispersal?
What may be a more tractable way to get at that is to determine what environmental settings elicit the desired dispersal patterns, which is what I see more current research doing. Because dispersal is influenced by landscape factors (e.g. fragmentation) and population factors (e.g. density-dependence), designing pool networks that account for these influences may be able to produce dispersal that matches the population management goals. Also, research is trying to differentiate metapopulation structure from a “ponds-as-patches” structure, where pond clusters function as a single independent population. This may be mediated by spatial organization (proximity, pool density), which pool designs can vary in order to manage the population as desired. Identifying genetic traits which could be targeted to achieve desired dispersal rates is a good way to attack the problem from a different angle, but may be equally difficult.
Daniel McGarvey
IGERT Alum
You’ve done a nice job of demonstrating significant differences in step length and turn angle among differing translocation scales. But there are some subtle assumptions one must make when assessing the biological relevance of individual steps and turns. Most interestingly (to me) is the question of whether your specimens are searching out new habitats/pools in a deliberate or sentient manner. On this note, have you tried comparing complete trails (I noticed you showed one on the poster) with some “null models” of animal movement, such as Levy flight paths? You might have alluded to this in “Future Research”, but I’m not quite sure. . .
Michael Habberfield
Thanks, good observation about the necessary biological assumptions. First off, we are trying to make inferences about dispersal from post-translocation movements, which may or may not be biologically equivalent to dispersal. Translocations are an effective method because of the ability to standardize motivations for moving, but dispersal itself is a complex behavior which may manifest itself differently under natural conditions. Indeed, some of the next analysis stages will examine how the movement paths relate to other models of movement or dispersal.
Most of the movement paths recorded here have strong directionality (like the truncated example in the figure), suggesting dispersal as opposed to foraging movements often associated with Levy flights/random walks. The step-lengths appear to fit a log-normal distribution (but perhaps a Levy distribution better?). It will be interesting to see if the parameters are distinct for particular portions of the movement path, i.e. is there a marked change in path structure as they perceive, assess, and ultimately select the new habitat, and is this affected by the translocation scale? I also plan to incorporate analyses of tortuosity and fractal dimension of the movement paths to further investigate how the animals are searching the landscape and how they might respond at different scales.
Daniel McGarvey
IGERT Alum
Pretty on-point response, Michael! I’ll keep my eyes peeled for some of your results in the literature. . .
Volker Radeloff
Faculty: Project Co-PI
Dear Michael,
Great way to tackle the pesky problem of dispersal distances and directions! Regarding the restoration though, ultimately, this is something that I assume land managers and land owners would be tasked with / invited to do? Is that right? I am curious if you have partners in your work that can introduce those perspectives, inform your work, and help spread the word?
Best,
Volker
Michael Habberfield
I’m glad you brought up this aspect of the work! Successful wetland restoration will certainly require sound science with tangible applications, dissemination of the knowledge, and willing partners/landowners. Restoration will ultimately hinge on project goals and human values. Luckily, I think recent years have seen more fruitful relationships between on-the-ground managers and agencies striving to offer expert knowledge. For instance, there is a trend toward project prioritizations based on functional significance and public outreach about what ecological services are being provided on people’s land. The topics my research tackles can be incorporated into these planning frameworks.
For this project, my collaborators at SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry partnered with a regional network of county soil and water conservation districts, the Upper Susquehanna Coalition. USC implements coordinated project planning amongst the public and agencies to enhance natural resources in the region, such as creating and restoring vernal pools. By partnering with a research university, USC is taking an important step to link the research with the action. I think my colleagues at ESF can speak more to the partnership with USC and what it affords both parties.
Virginia Anderson
Partner: Other
This poster clearly illustrates that amphibian research is interdisciplinary and high tech! Photographs,diagrams, and graphics make each point clear visually and /or verbally. Fluorescent tags and dye powder allow specimens to be tracked in time and space. How did you control for depth and size of the ponds(both factors controlled at the start), as the season progressed? Very professional poster!
Michael Habberfield
Thanks for your interest and compliments, Dr. Anderson! The pool areas in early summer are 39 ± 18 m2 (mean ± SD) and certainly change differently throughout the season. Water depth is continuously recorded and can be used as a covariate in multivariate models of pool selection. I might investigate if and how selection is influenced by the size/depth of an individual’s original pool and/or the pools available during the selection process.
Although I don’t know if I can answer it with my project, it would also be interesting to see if dispersal and habitat selection change during different times of the year in response to changing water depth, or between years based on climate differences. Future work might also experimentally control water depths to simulate dispersal under predicted climate scenarios.
Virginia Anderson
Partner: Other
Thanks and let me say that your video was such a great “advanced organizer”. It allowed me to be prepared for and engaged in each aspect of the poster!